Common (Stock) Sense about Risk-Shifting and Bank Bailouts
University of Louisiana at Lafayette - College of Business Administration
Wilfrid Laurier University
January 1, 2010
Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 3-29, 2010
If a bank faces potential insolvency, it will be tempted to reject good loans and accept bad loans to shift risk onto its creditors. We analyze effectiveness of buying up toxic mortgages in troubled banks, buying preferred stock, and buying common stock. If bailouts for banks that are deemed "too-big-to-fail" involve buying assets at above fair market values, then these banks are encouraged ex ante to gamble on bad assets. Buying up common (preferred) stock is always the most (least) ex ante- and ex post-efficient type of capital infusion, whether or not the bank volunteers for the recapitalization.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 55
Keywords: asset substitution, banks, bailout, Capital Assistance Program (CAP), Capital Purchase Program (CPP), capital structure, Emergency Economic Stabilization Act (EESA), Leman Brothers, Public-Private Investment Program (PPIP), lending, risk-shifting, too big to fail,Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP)
JEL Classification: G21, G28, G38
Date posted: December 30, 2008 ; Last revised: April 15, 2012
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.203 seconds