Abstract

 
 

References (60)



 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



Intuitive Numbers Guide Decisions


Ellen Peters


Ohio State University - Psychology Department; Decision Research; University of Oregon

Paul Slovic


Decision Research; University of Oregon - Department of Psychology

Daniel Västfjäll


Göteborg University

C. K. Mertz


Decision Research


Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 3, pp. 619-635, December 2008

Abstract:     
Measuring reaction times to number comparisons is thought to reveal a processing stage in elementary numerical cognition linked to internal, imprecise representations of number magnitudes. These intuitive representations of the mental number line have been demonstrated across species and human development but have been little explored in decision making. This paper develops and tests hypotheses about the influence of such evolutionarily ancient, intuitive numbers on human decisions. We demonstrate that individuals with more precise mental-number-line representations are higher in numeracy (number skills) consistent with previous research with children. Individuals with more precise representations (compared to those with less precise representations) also were more likely to choose larger, later amounts over smaller, immediate amounts, particularly with a larger proportional difference between the two monetary outcomes. In addition, they were more likely to choose an option with a larger proportional but smaller absolute difference compared to those with less precise representations. These results are consistent with intuitive number representations underlying: a) perceived differences between numbers, b) the extent to which proportional differences are weighed in decisions, and, ultimately, c) the valuation of decision options. Human decision processes involving numbers important to health and financial matters may be rooted in elementary, biological processes shared with other species.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 17

Keywords: decision making, numerical cognition, numeracy, proportional reasoning, individual differences

JEL Classification: D81, D90

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 5, 2009 ; Last revised: January 6, 2009

Suggested Citation

Peters, Ellen, Slovic, Paul, Västfjäll, Daniel and Mertz, C. K., Intuitive Numbers Guide Decisions. Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 3, pp. 619-635, December 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1321907

Contact Information

Ellen Peters (Contact Author)
Ohio State University - Psychology Department ( email )
Blankenship Hall-2010
901 Woody Hayes Drive
Columbus, OH OH 43210
United States
Decision Research ( email )
1201 Oak Street, Suite 200
Eugene, OR 97401
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.decisionresearch.org
University of Oregon ( email )
1280 University of Oregon
Eugene, OR 97403
United States
Paul Slovic
Decision Research ( email )
1201 Oak Street, Suite 200
Eugene, OR 97401
United States
541-485-2400 (Phone)
541-485-2403 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.decisionresearch.org
University of Oregon - Department of Psychology ( email )
Eugene, OR 97403
United States
541-485-2400 (Phone)
Daniel Västfjäll
Göteborg University ( email )
Viktoriagatan 30
Goeteborg, 405 30
Sweden
C. K. Mertz
Decision Research ( email )
1201 Oak Street, Suite 200
Eugene, OR 97401
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 762
Downloads: 132
Download Rank: 109,176
References:  60
Citations:  1

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.422 seconds