Mental Statism and the Experience Machine

Adam J. Kolber

Brooklyn Law School

Winter 1994

Bard Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 3, pp. 10-17, Winter 1994/1995
San Diego Legal Studies Paper No. 08-082

According to Robert Nozick's famous "experience machine" argument, we would not choose to spend our lives with our brains connected to a machine that could deliver any set of experiences we desire. Because most of us would decline to live any variant of life in "The Matrix," so to speak, the thought experiment purportedly demonstrates that we value aspects of life other than just subjective experiences.

I argue that while most would not connect to the experience machine, many would not disconnect from it either if they were already connected. Unless we have a reason to privilege the views of those currently disconnected, Nozick fails to prove his broader point about the nature of value.

This article was published when I was an undergraduate. I am posting it now to SSRN because the topic has gained renewed interest among experimental philosophers and neuroethicists.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 9

Keywords: Hedonism, Robert Nozick, Experience Machine, Utilitarianism, Axiology, Matrix

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: January 3, 2009 ; Last revised: July 29, 2009

Suggested Citation

Kolber, Adam J., Mental Statism and the Experience Machine (Winter 1994). Bard Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 3, pp. 10-17, Winter 1994/1995; San Diego Legal Studies Paper No. 08-082. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1322059

Contact Information

Adam Jason Kolber (Contact Author)
Brooklyn Law School ( email )
250 Joralemon Street
Brooklyn, NY 11201
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,935
Downloads: 355
Download Rank: 61,677
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 1.438 seconds