|
||||
|
||||
Mental Statism and the Experience Machine
Adam J. Kolber University of San Diego School of Law; Brooklyn Law School Bard Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 3, pp. 10-17, Winter 1994/1995 San Diego Legal Studies Paper No. 08-082 Abstract: According to Robert Nozick's famous "experience machine" argument, we would not choose to spend our lives with our brains connected to a machine that could deliver any set of experiences we desire. Because most of us would decline to live any variant of life in "The Matrix," so to speak, the thought experiment purportedly demonstrates that we value aspects of life other than just subjective experiences. I argue that while most would not connect to the experience machine, many would not disconnect from it either if they were already connected. Unless we have a reason to privilege the views of those currently disconnected, Nozick fails to prove his broader point about the nature of value. This article was published when I was an undergraduate. I am posting it now to SSRN because the topic has gained renewed interest among experimental philosophers and neuroethicists.
Keywords: Hedonism, Robert Nozick, Experience Machine, Utilitarianism, Axiology, Matrix Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: January 03, 2009 ; Last revised: July 29, 2009Suggested Citation |
|
|||||||
© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apolloa 4 in 0.250 seconds.