Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1323471
 
 

References (31)



 
 

Citations (4)



 


 



An Empirical Evaluation of the Transitivity, Monotonicity, Accounting, and Conjoint Axioms for Perceived Risk


Elke U. Weber


Columbia Business School - Management & Psychology

William P. Bottom


Washington University in Saint Louis - John M. Olin Business School

April 1990

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 253-275

Abstract:     
This study tests the adequacy of the axioms underlying Luce and Weber's (1986) conjoint expected risk model. Risk judgments are found to be transitive. Monotonicity or the substitution principle per se seems to hold, but the related probability accounting assumption is violated. The conjoint structure assumptions about the effect of change of scale transformations on risk hold for negative-outcome lotteries but encounter some difficulty for positive-outcome lotteries. Possible explanations for violations are suggested, and implications of these results for the modeling of perceived risk are discussed.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 23

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 7, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Weber, Elke U. and Bottom, William P., An Empirical Evaluation of the Transitivity, Monotonicity, Accounting, and Conjoint Axioms for Perceived Risk (April 1990). Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 253-275. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1323471

Contact Information

Elke U. Weber (Contact Author)
Columbia Business School - Management & Psychology ( email )
3022 Broadway
New York, NY 10027
United States

William P. Bottom
Washington University in Saint Louis - John M. Olin Business School ( email )
One Brookings Drive
Campus Box 1133
St. Louis, MO 63130-4899
United States
314-935-6351 (Phone)
314-935-6359 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.olin.wustl.edu/faculty/bottom.html
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 245
Downloads: 36
References:  31
Citations:  4

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.282 seconds