Abstract

  
 

References (7)



 


 



Postscript: Rejoinder to Brandstatter, Gigerenzer, and Hertwig (2006)


Eric J. Johnson


Columbia Business School - Marketing

Michael Schulte-Mecklenbeck


ETH Zürich

Martijn C. Willemsen


Eindhoven University of Technology
2008

Psychological Review, pp. 272-273, 2008

Abstract:     
We appreciate that Brandstatter, Gigerenzer, and Hertwig (2008) agree that process models are indeed useful for advancing researchers' understanding of choice processes. Their statement that choices represent adaptive process is also welcome (see Payne, Bettman, & Johnson, 1993), as is the emphasis on multiple measures. However, we do disagree on two empirical matters.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 2

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 8, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Johnson, Eric J., Schulte-Mecklenbeck, Michael and Willemsen, Martijn C., Postscript: Rejoinder to Brandstatter, Gigerenzer, and Hertwig (2006) (2008). Psychological Review, pp. 272-273, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1323477

Contact Information

Eric J. Johnson (Contact Author)
Columbia Business School - Marketing ( email )
New York, NY 10027
United States

Michael Schulte-Mecklenbeck
ETH Zürich ( email )
Zürichbergstrasse 18
Zurich, 8092
Switzerland
Martijn C. Willemsen
Eindhoven University of Technology ( email )
Human-Technoogy Interaction
P.O. Box 513
5600 MB Endhoven
Netherlands
HOME PAGE: http://www.vlab.nl/willemsen
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 266
Downloads: 15
References:  7

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.609 seconds