Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1324005
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (9)



 


 



A New Jurisprudence for Africa


H. Kwasi Prempeh


Seton Hall University School of Law

July 1999

Journal of Democracy, Vol. 10, No. 3, July 1999

Abstract:     
In this essay, the author argues that, despite the adoption of new rights-friendly constitutions in Africa's emerging democracies, an old "jurisprudence of executive supremacy," fashioned during the era of authoritarianism (colonial and postcolonial) and characterized by a high degree of deference to state (executive) power and a general skepticism about individual rights, remains highly influential within Africa's common-law judiciaries. There is thus a danger that judicial review and constitutional interpretation would retard, instead of facilitate, progress towards constitutional liberalism in Africa's new democracies.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 15

Keywords: judicial review, comparative constitutionalism, Africa democracy, courts

JEL Classification: N40, N47

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 8, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Prempeh, H. Kwasi, A New Jurisprudence for Africa (July 1999). Journal of Democracy, Vol. 10, No. 3, July 1999. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1324005

Contact Information

H. Kwasi Prempeh (Contact Author)
Seton Hall University School of Law ( email )
One Newark Center
Newark, NJ 07102
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 494
Downloads: 72
Download Rank: 194,654
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  9

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.281 seconds