|
||||
|
||||
Do Defaults Save Lives?Eric J. JohnsonColumbia Business School - Marketing Daniel G. GoldsteinMicrosoft Research New York City; London Business School Nov 21, 2003 Science, Vol. 302, pp. 1338-1339, 2003 Abstract: The article discusses how should policy-makers choose defaults regarding organ donors. First, consider that every policy must have a no-action default, and defaults impose physical, cognitive, and, in the case of donation, emotional costs on those who must change their status. Second, note that defaults can lead to two kinds of misclassification, willing donors who are not identified or people who become donors against their wishes. Changes in defaults could increase donations in the United States of additional thousands of donors a year. Because each donor can be used for about three transplants, the consequences are substantial in lives saved.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 2 Keywords: organ donors, donation of organs, donation of tissues, transplantation Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: January 9, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.781 seconds