Reflections on Private Property, Planning, and State Power
Steven J. Eagle
Antonin Scalia Law School, George Mason University
January 8, 2009
Planning & Environmental Law, Vol. 61, No. 1, pp. 3-11, January 2009
George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 09-02
This essay, in a journal for professional planners and planning lawyers, proposes that the debate between advocates of private property rights and of expansive government regulation of land use be tempered by recognition that the U.S. Supreme Court's takings jurisprudence has not always been as partisan as often portrayed. The essay discusses land use regulation and the appropriate role of planners, in light of information costs and rent seeking. It discusses the difficulties in fine tuning land use through municipal industrial policy and in providing meaningful post-Kelo scrutiny to municipal condemnations for economic development. The essay concludes by suggesting that, under these circumstances, local regulation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is not auspicious.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 10
Keywords: Brennan, climate change, condemnation, eminent domain, information problems, land use planning, Mandelker, municipal industrial policy, nirvana fallacy, police power hawks, private property, property rights, Penn Central, Progressive Era, public choice, regulatory takings, San Diego Gas & Electric
JEL Classification: K11, K32, Q24, Q58, R52
Date posted: January 9, 2009
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.203 seconds