Damage Done? The Status of NEPA after Winter v. NRDC and Answers to Lingering Questions Left Open by the Court

William S. Eubanks II

Meyer Glitzenstein & Crystal; Vermont Law School; George Washington University - Law School; American University - Washington College of Law

Vermont Law Review, Vol. 33, p. 649, 2009

In November 2008, the United States Supreme Court decided Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 555 U.S. (2008). At issue in the case were many questions regarding the use of naval sonar and the impacts of that use on marine mammals such as whales and dolphins. The environmental plaintiffs alleged that the Navy violated the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) by conducting training exercises without first fully considering the environmental impact of the exercises as required by NEPA. The Court issued an expedited opinion, deciding the case very narrowly on equitable balancing grounds under the unique facts of the case. This narrow decision by the Court left many important legal questions unanswered. This article provides post-Winter guidance to federal courts addressing issues under NEPA where the Supreme Court has not definitively spoken. Specifically, the first portion of this article dissects the Court's irreparable harm analysis in Winter and predicts the effect this standard will have in future NEPA cases. The second portion of this article answers three critical NEPA questions left open by the Winter Court's narrow decision. This section thoroughly analyzes court decisions and other relevant information to provide rational and detailed resolution to these questions in an effort to assist courts confronted with these issues in the future.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 22

Keywords: National Environmental Policy Act, NEPA, Navy, naval sonar, environmental impact statement, EIS, EA, wildlife impacts, emergency circumstances

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: January 13, 2009 ; Last revised: August 12, 2009

Suggested Citation

Eubanks, William S., Damage Done? The Status of NEPA after Winter v. NRDC and Answers to Lingering Questions Left Open by the Court. Vermont Law Review, Vol. 33, p. 649, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1325744

Contact Information

William S. Eubanks II (Contact Author)
Meyer Glitzenstein & Crystal ( email )
1601 Connecticut Ave., N.W.
Suite 700
Washington, DC 20009-1056
United States
Vermont Law School
South Royalton, VT 05068
United States

George Washington University - Law School ( email )
Washington, DC 20052
United States

American University - Washington College of Law ( email )
Washington, DC 20016
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,746
Downloads: 463
Download Rank: 38,127

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.297 seconds