Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1327032
 
 

Citations (2)



 
 

Footnotes (218)



 


 



Missing in Activism: Retail Investor Absence in Corporate Elections


Lee Harris


University of Memphis - Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law

January 13, 2009

Columbia Business Law Review, No. 1, 2010
University of Memphis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 45

Abstract:     
Shareholder-led campaigns to install new leadership at U.S. firms — so-called proxy contests — occur too rarely and, when they do occur, are led by the same, boring cast of characters too often. This Article presents empirical evidence from a hand-collected database of public filings of proxy statements from 2006, 2007, and 2008, the years public filings are available from the SEC electronic filing system. In short, the data suggest that the system of contested corporate elections is broken and, from there, the Article points the way toward legal reform. When it comes to the interests of retail investors — i.e., individuals with small stakes in a particular firm — the evidence suggests that contested corporate elections are virtually off-limits as conduit for activism. Retail investors almost never launch a campaign and their interests are not represented well by those who do.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 102

Keywords: proxy contests, corporate elections, proxy solicitations, retail investors

JEL Classification: K20, K22

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: January 14, 2009 ; Last revised: July 2, 2010

Suggested Citation

Harris, Lee, Missing in Activism: Retail Investor Absence in Corporate Elections (January 13, 2009). Columbia Business Law Review, No. 1, 2010; University of Memphis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 45. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1327032

Contact Information

Lee Harris (Contact Author)
University of Memphis - Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law ( email )
One North Front Street
Memphis, TN 38103-2189
United States
901-678-1393 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,332
Downloads: 413
Download Rank: 40,391
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  218
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.437 seconds