Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1327776
 
 

Footnotes (60)



 


 



Was Dred Scott Correctly Decided? An 'Expert Report' for the Defendant


Paul Finkelman


Albany Law School - Government Law Center

2008

Lewis & Clark Law Review, Vol. 12, No. 4, 2008

Abstract:     
This Article offers an "expert report" for the defendant in Dred Scott, and argues that "given the history of the writing of the Constitution, the importance of slavery to the American economy, the specific protections for slavery found in the Constitution, and the politics of the era," the "decision upholding Dred Scott's status as a slave was surely inevitable." However, from "the perspective of modern scholarship . . . it is not unreasonable to ask if the case was in fact correctly decided. To ask this question is not to defend [Chief Justice] Taney's racism" or to argue "in favor of slavery." Instead, this Article suggests "how the Court might have reached the same result that Chief Jusitce Taney reached - and why perhaps the result was constitutionally correct - without relying on racism or aggressively proslavery thought."

Number of Pages in PDF File: 34

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: January 16, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Finkelman, Paul, Was Dred Scott Correctly Decided? An 'Expert Report' for the Defendant (2008). Lewis & Clark Law Review, Vol. 12, No. 4, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1327776

Contact Information

Paul Finkelman (Contact Author)
Albany Law School - Government Law Center ( email )
80 New Scotland Avenue
Albany, NY 12208
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,545
Downloads: 346
Download Rank: 50,126
Footnotes:  60

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.438 seconds