Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1327856
 
 

Footnotes (319)



 


 



Incarceration, Accommodation, and Strict Scrutiny


James David Nelson


Columbia University - Law School


Virginia Law Review, Vol. 95, No. 8, 2009

Abstract:     
The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) requires the application of strict scrutiny to policies substantially burdening the religious exercise of prisoners. Although RLUIPA was passed without dissent, critics and commentators have tended to accept three skeptical claims about the use of strict scrutiny in this context: (1) changes in the formal level of scrutiny applicable to claims for religious accommodation are irrelevant to case outcomes; (2) even the most sympathetic statutory language will not improve prisoners' chances of success in seeking accommodations; (3) using the language of strict scrutiny in prison cases will diminish its force in other areas of the law. This paper challenges these skeptical conclusions. Since RLUIPA was passed in 2000, federal courts have reviewed hundreds of claims brought by prisoners seeking accommodations. Some federal circuit courts have continued to defer to the judgment of prison administrators when denying exemptions. Other federal courts, however, are employing a more rigorous form of review, taking a "hard look" at prison policies that burden religion, and reviewing carefully the claims of prison administrators. Moreover, rather than diluting strict scrutiny in other areas of the law, these courts are using doctrine from outside of the accommodation context to resolve prisoner claims. The emergence of a searching form of review in the prison context is surprising. After detailing an emerging conflict among the federal courts of appeal, this paper argues that firm constitutional footing, statutory specificity, and the importation of searching review from equal protection and free speech cases all help to explain this unexpected development. This paper concludes with some thoughts about how proponents of religious accommodation should proceed in light of the limited but real success of RLUIPA.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 76

Keywords: Religion, Accommodation, Prison, RLUIPA, Strict Scrutiny

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: January 14, 2009 ; Last revised: February 4, 2010

Suggested Citation

Nelson, James David, Incarceration, Accommodation, and Strict Scrutiny. Virginia Law Review, Vol. 95, No. 8, 2009 . Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1327856

Contact Information

James David Nelson (Contact Author)
Columbia University - Law School ( email )
435 West 116th Street
New York, NY 10025
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,041
Downloads: 96
Download Rank: 167,436
Footnotes:  319

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.266 seconds