Kelsen's Development of the Fehlerkalkuel-Theory
King's College London – The Dickson Poon School of Law
March 1, 2005
Ratio Juris, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 46-63, March 2005
In this article the author follows the arguments of the Vienna School of Legal Positivism, and especially of Hans Kelsen, as concerns the intellectual topos of "law contrary to law". The issues dealt with feature under various headings - albeit always prominently - in the national schools of legal theory. What distinguishes the Viennese approach is the generality and abstractness which facilitate the unification of legal phenomena generally considered unrelated. The goal of the article is threefold: firstly, to bring the important, albeit mostly maltreated theory of the Fehlerkalkul ("error-calculus") into the light of theoretical attention; secondly, to demonstrate Kelsen's method of developing legal philosophy only given concrete problems of the positive law and its theory; finally, to deal with criticism.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 18
Keywords: alternative authorisation, legal positivism, ultra viresAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: January 16, 2009
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.469 seconds