False Confessions: Causes, Consequences and Implications
Richard A. Leo
University of San Francisco - School of Law
January 1, 2009
The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 2009
Univ. of San Francisco Law Research Paper No. 2009-11
In the last two decades, hundred of convicted prisoners have been exonerated by DNA and non-DNA evidence, revealing that police-induced false confessions are a leading cause of the wrongful conviction of the innocent. This article reviews the empirical research on the causes and correlates of false confessions. After looking at the three sequential processes that are responsible for the elicitation of false confessions - misclassification, coercion and contamination - this article reviews the three psychologically distinct types of false confession (voluntary, compliant and persuaded) and then discusses the consequences of introducing false confession evidence in the criminal justice system. The article concludes with a brief discussion of the implications of empirical research for reducing the number of false confessions and improving the accuracy of confession evidence that is introduced against a defendant at trial.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 13
Keywords: false confession, wrongful conviction, empirical researchAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: January 16, 2009 ; Last revised: October 18, 2009
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.406 seconds