Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1329201
 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



'Ducking' TRIPS in India: A Saga Involving Novartis and the Legality of Section 3(d)


Shamnad Basheer


West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences

Prashant Reddy


Independent

January 17, 2009

National Law School of India Review, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 131-155, 2008

Abstract:     
Glivec, a path-breaking anticancer drug by Novartis propelled Indian patent law onto the world stage in an interesting theatre involving TRIPS and the yet unresolved issue of pharmaceutical patents and their impact on access to medicines.

In 2006, the Indian patent office rejected a patent application covering Glivec (or "Gleevec" as it is known in the United States). The rejection stemmed, inter alia, from a unique section in the Indian patent regime (section 3(d)) that prohibits the patenting of new forms of existing pharmaceutical substances that do not demonstrate significantly enhanced "efficacy."

Not only did Novartis appeal the patent office decision, but in a rather controversial move, it challenged the TRIPS compatibility and constitutionality of section 3(d). The Madras High Court ruled that section 3(d) was constitutional. It also held that it did not have jurisdiction to rule on the TRIPS issue. This paper will critically examine the constitutionality and TRIPS compatibility issues thrown up by section 3(d). It will argue that the court was right in defending the constitutionality of section 3(d). It will also go on to demonstrate that section 3(d) is compatible with TRIPS.

However, it will question the court's "ducking" of the TRIPS issue by claiming that it lacked "jurisdiction" on this count. In particular, it critiques the reasoning of the court on this count and argues that the court ignored a number of sound Indian precedents in favour of outdated case law from abroad.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 25

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 18, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Basheer, Shamnad and Reddy, Prashant, 'Ducking' TRIPS in India: A Saga Involving Novartis and the Legality of Section 3(d) (January 17, 2009). National Law School of India Review, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 131-155, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1329201

Contact Information

Shamnad Basheer (Contact Author)
West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences ( email )
12, LB Block, Sector III
Salt Lake City
Kolkata, West Bengal 700 064
India
9818825148 (Phone)
Prashant Reddy
Independent ( email )
No Address Available
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,167
Downloads: 985
Download Rank: 11,514
Citations:  1
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.485 seconds