|
||||
|
||||
Shareholder, Creditor and Worker Protection: Time Series Evidence about the Differences between French, German, Indian, UK and US LawMathias M. SiemsDurham University - Durham Law School; University of Cambridge - Centre for Business Research May 29, 2009 Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, Working Paper No. 381 Abstract: This paper uses a new quantitative methodology ("numerical comparative law", "leximetrics") in order to answer the questions of whether there has been convergence, divergence or persistence of for shareholder, creditor, and worker protection, and how this development relates to the Common Law/Civil Law distinction. It is based on new indices which code the legal development of France, Germany, India, the UK and the US from 1970 to 2005. The main result is that one has to distinguish between different areas of law: the laws have converged in shareholder protection, they have diverged in worker protection and in creditor protection converging and diverging trends even out. These results do not depend on the distinction between Civil Law and Common Law countries, because there have been a number of instances where countries of different legal families have converged and countries of the same legal family have diverged.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 28 Keywords: shareholder protection, creditor protection, worker protection, comparative law, legal convergence, numerical comparative law, leximetrics JEL Classification: G30, K00, K12, K31, N20, N40, P50 working papers seriesDate posted: January 19, 2009 ; Last revised: June 1, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.422 seconds