Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1331375
 
 

Footnotes (76)



 


 



In Defence of the Common Law Constitution: Unwritten Rights as Fundamental Law


T. R. S. Allan


University of Cambridge - Faculty of Law

January 22, 2009

LSE Legal Studies Working Paper No. 5/2009

Abstract:     
Brudner argues that liberal constitutionalism, or the rule of Law, requires the adoption of a written constitution, regulating the respective powers of court and legislature. In his analysis, the common law constitution is associated with a libertarian paradigm that gives way, in part, to an egalitarian one embodied in a sovereign constitutional text. I argue, to the contrary, that the preservation of the rule of Law, including the protection of liberal rights, does not require a codified constitution, but demands only the consistent application of the correct legal principles to particular cases. Statutes must always be interpreted consistently with such principles: their meaning and validity are alike dependent on their compatibility with fundamental constitutional rights. Demands that cannot be acknowledged as legitimate requirements by an independent moral agent cannot qualify as law.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 19

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 26, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Allan, T. R. S., In Defence of the Common Law Constitution: Unwritten Rights as Fundamental Law (January 22, 2009). LSE Legal Studies Working Paper No. 5/2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1331375 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1331375

Contact Information

T. R. S. Allan (Contact Author)
University of Cambridge - Faculty of Law ( email )
10 West Road
Cambridge, CB3 9DZ
United Kingdom
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,620
Downloads: 368
Download Rank: 45,057
Footnotes:  76

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.328 seconds