Legal Positivism and 'Explaining' Normativity and Authority
University of Minnesota Law School
American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Philosophy and Law, Vol. 5, No. 2, Spring 2006
Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09-05
It has become increasingly common for legal positivist theorists to claim that the primary objective of legal theory in general, and legal positivism in particular, is "explaining normativity." The phrase "explaining normativity" can be understood either ambitiously or more modestly. The more modest meaning is an analytical exploration of what is meant by legal or moral obligation, or by the authority claims of legal officials. When the term is understood ambitiously - as meaning an explanation of how conventional and other empirical facts can give rise to moral obligations - as many legal positivist theorists seem to be using the phrase, the project is contrary to basic tenets of legal positivism, and has regularly led theorists to propose doubtful theories that ignore "is"/"ought" divisions.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 6
Keywords: legal positivism, analytical legal theory, natural law theoryAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: January 23, 2009 ; Last revised: January 29, 2009
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.406 seconds