|
||||
|
||||
The Process-Welfare Nexus
Reza Dibadj University of San Francisco - School of Law Oklahoma City University Law Review, Forthcoming Abstract: In an era fashionable for its simplistic trashing of the regulatory state, Steven Croley's Regulation and Public Interests provides welcome respite. Croley mounts a valiant defense of regulation. His central argument is straightforward; namely, "that the cynical view of regulation shows far too little attention to the actual processes through which administrative agencies regulate. . . . Once the administrative state is unpacked-once it is considered in light of its procedural complexities-grim conclusions about the inability of regulatory institutions to advance the general welfare give way to more optimistic assessments." (p. 4). This book review argues that while Croley presents a thought-provoking defense of the regulatory state, the nexus he creates between process and welfare is not entirely convincing. The article proceeds in three parts. Part I offers a brief overview of the book. Part II highlights the significant strengths of Croley's endeavor. Finally, Part III suggests some possible gaps in the book's arguments.
Keywords: regulation, administrative law JEL Classifications: G18, K20, L50 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: January 25, 2009 ; Last revised: January 25, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.281 seconds.