SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (202)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

The Paradox of Professionalism: Global Law Practice Means Business

Christopher J. Whelan
University of Oxford - Faculty of Law



Penn State International Review, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2009
Washington & Lee Legal Studies Paper No. 2009-01
Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 3/2009

Abstract:     
This article outlines the contrasting 'professional' and 'business' visions of legal practice and the lawyer's role in society. It sets out the regulatory 'maze' that had developed in the UK prior to 2007, reflecting the unresolved business/profession dichotomy. In 2007, radical and revolutionary reforms were introduced in the Legal Services Act. The reforms appear to signal an end to professionalism, the final intrusion of the marketplace into legal services, and the victory of the business vision of legal practice. However, I argue that a closer analysis suggests that a new vision of legal practice has been created specifically - and paradoxically - with global law practice in mind. Law should be both a business and a profession because professionalism is good for business! Global law practice has been reconstituted as a hybrid: business and profession.

Keywords: global law, commercialism, professionalism, legal services

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: January 29, 2009 ; Last revised: February 21, 2009

Suggested Citation

Whelan, Christopher J., The Paradox of Professionalism: Global Law Practice Means Business (January 28, 2009). Penn State International Review, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2009; Washington & Lee Legal Studies Paper No. 2009-01; Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 3/2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1334119


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Christopher J. Whelan (Contact Author)
University of Oxford - Faculty of Law ( email )
United Kingdom
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 277
Downloads: 121
Download Rank: 67,908
Footnotes: 202
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo3 in 0.454 seconds.