Abstract

 
 

References (42)



 


 



Knowledge Transfer in Project Reviews: The Effect of Self-Justification Bias and Moral Hazard


Mandy M. Cheng


University of New South Wales (UNSW) - School of Accounting

Axel K-D Schulz


University of Melbourne - Faculty of Business and Economics

Peter Booth


University of Technology, Sydney (UTS) - School of Accounting


Accounting & Finance, Vol. 49, No. 1, pp. 75-93, March 2009

Abstract:     
In this study, we examine two factors that impact managers willingness to share private information during the project review stage of capital budgeting. Drawing on the cognitive dissonance theory and the agency theory, we find that both high perceived personal responsibility and the use of project reviews for performance evaluation result in a greater tendency for managers to withhold negative private information. However, we do not find an interaction between these two factors. Our study makes a contribution to both the academic literature investigating factors affecting project reviews and the practitioner literature looking at design and implementation of effective project reviews.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 19

JEL Classification: G31, G34, D82, M40, M46

Accepted Paper Series


Date posted: January 31, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Cheng, Mandy M., Schulz, Axel K-D and Booth, Peter, Knowledge Transfer in Project Reviews: The Effect of Self-Justification Bias and Moral Hazard. Accounting & Finance, Vol. 49, No. 1, pp. 75-93, March 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1335538 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2008.00271.x

Contact Information

Mandy M. Cheng (Contact Author)
University of New South Wales (UNSW) - School of Accounting ( email )
Sydney, NSW 2052
Australia
(612) 9385.6343 (Phone)
Axel K-D Schulz
University of Melbourne - Faculty of Business and Economics ( email )
Victoria, 3010
Australia
Peter Booth
University of Technology, Sydney (UTS) - School of Accounting ( email )
P.O. Box 123
Broadway NSW 2007
Australia
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 458
Downloads: 2
References:  42
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.829 seconds