Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1337129
 
 

Footnotes (154)



 


 



Trans Fat


Elizabeth M. Glazer


Hofstra University - Maurice A. Deane School of Law

Zachary A. Kramer


Arizona State University - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law

February 3, 2009

Hofstra Univ. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09-11
Penn State Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08-2009

Abstract:     
In her book, Fat Rights: Dilemmas of Difference and Personhood, Professor Anna Kirkland uses fat discrimination as a case study to examine the ways in which we talk about difference in antidiscrimination law. She argues that the proper way to frame questions of difference in antidiscrimination is not in terms of protected traits or categories, but rather in terms of what she calls "logics of personhood." The logics of personhood are narratives that enable us to talk about which differences matter in a given discrimination case. In other words, they are ways of talking about what happens when people do or do not have rights, as well as whether certain people should be protected by antidiscrimination law. After applying the logics to the case of fat discrimination, Kirkland joins a growing community of scholars seeking to transcend antidiscrimination law's categories. By identifying in the logics of personhood the presumptions that lay beneath the surface of antidiscrimination law, Kirkland creates an entirely new way to talk about differences among people.

In this Book Review, we extend Professor Kirkland's discussion of fat plaintiffs to a discussion of transgender plaintiffs. Much like fat plaintiffs, transgender plaintiffs' only hope of articulating actionable discrimination claims is to map their claims onto existing antidiscrimination norms. As Kirkland demonstrates in Fat Rights, fat plaintiffs must cast themselves as disabled in order to state an actionable discrimination claims. And as we demonstrate in this Book Review, transgender plaintiffs must cast themselves as gender-nonconformists in order to state actionable claims. While both fat and transgender employees may be willing to negotiate their identities to win lawsuits against their discriminatory employers, the purpose of this Book Review is to ask whether they should have to. We use Kirkland's logics of personhood to demonstrate that fat plaintiffs and transgender plaintiffs share a common frustration with respect to antidiscrimination law's protected categories, namely, that antidiscrimination law sees both fat people and transgender people differently from how they see themselves. And we argue further that this is a significant harm to a plaintiff's dignity and that antidiscrimination law should take into consideration such dignitary harms.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 32

Keywords: Antidiscrimination law, disability law, transgender, fat

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: February 4, 2009 ; Last revised: March 4, 2009

Suggested Citation

Glazer, Elizabeth M. and Kramer, Zachary A., Trans Fat (February 3, 2009). Hofstra Univ. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09-11; Penn State Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08-2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1337129 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1337129

Contact Information

Elizabeth M. Glazer
Hofstra University - Maurice A. Deane School of Law ( email )
121 Hofstra University
Hempstead, NY 11549
United States

Hofstra University Logo

Zachary A. Kramer (Contact Author)
Arizona State University - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law ( email )
Box 877906
Tempe, AZ 85287-7906
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,242
Downloads: 237
Download Rank: 75,918
Footnotes:  154

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.344 seconds