Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1337724
 
 

Footnotes (74)



 


 



Giles V. California: Avoiding Serious Damage to Crawford's Limited Revolution


Robert P. Mosteller


University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - School of Law


Lewis & Clark Law Review, Vol. 13, p. 675, 2009
UNC Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1337724

Abstract:     
This Article endorses the result in Giles v. California, which limited the reach of the forfeiture through wrongdoing exception to those instances where “the defendant engaged in conduct designed to prevent the witness from testifying.” Largely for practical and policy reasons, I find this result important and proper. Given the apparently limited coverage of out-of-court statements by the confrontation doctrine under the testimonial statement approach, expansive application of the forfeiture doctrine could have gutted much of its already restricted protection.

I also briefly sketch where I believe the new confrontation doctrine that Crawford v. Washington produced stands in protecting the rights of defendants against problematic hearsay statements. My judgment is that these developments have been important and largely positive but limited in impact. Moreover, the mini-revolution that Crawford spawned appears to have largely run its course, and the more recent decision of the Court in Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, which concluded that forensic certificates are testimonial, does not change that assessment.

Finally, Giles adds further evidence of the limited power of originalism to determine specific applications for the Confrontation Clause doctrine in a modern world that differs, both in legal structure and values, from the Framing era. Fortunately, the splintered decisions and analysis suggest that this misguided approach is losing its hold on the Court’s confrontation analysis and that pragmatic and policy concerns may play a stronger role on future developments in this area.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 22

Keywords: Confrontation Clause, hearsay

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: February 5, 2009 ; Last revised: November 5, 2009

Suggested Citation

Mosteller, Robert P., Giles V. California: Avoiding Serious Damage to Crawford's Limited Revolution. Lewis & Clark Law Review, Vol. 13, p. 675, 2009; UNC Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1337724. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1337724

Contact Information

Robert P. Mosteller (Contact Author)
University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - School of Law ( email )
Van Hecke-Wettach Hall, 160 Ridge Road
CB #3380
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3380
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,016
Downloads: 60
Download Rank: 218,864
Footnotes:  74

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.281 seconds