Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1338073
 


 



The Meritocratic Egalitarianism of Thurgood Marshall


Mark Tushnet


Harvard Law School


Howard Law Journal, Vol. 52, No. 3, 2009
Harvard Public Law Working Paper No. 09-15

Abstract:     
This Essay, forthcoming in the Howard Law Journal, describes Thurgood Marshall's meritocratic egalitarianism. Marshall was sensitive to the wide range of talents people actually had and was skeptical about claims that talents in any field were distributed in a steep pyramid, with many less talented at the base and only a few highly talented at the top. For him, there was a meritocratic pyramid, but it was flat rather than steep. All but the very best at most things were only slightly better and only somewhat less numerous than those who had ordinary ability in the field. Marshall was also extremely sensitive to the range of bad reasons people gave for perpetuating hierarchies ordered by ascriptive characteristics - race most obviously, but also gender, class, and disability. A real meritocracy required the elimination of all those bad reasons so that careers, broadly defined, really would be open to talent. Governments could not use ascriptive characteristics to perpetuate hierarchies that interfered with the prospect of a person pursuing a career suitable to his or her talents. And, conversely, policies aimed at eliminating the use of ascriptive characteristics to perpetuate such hierarchies - what has come to be known as affirmative action - were entirely proper. Taken as a whole, Marshall's meritocratic egalitarianism was strongly critical both of the distribution of social benefits and harms in the United States, which did not conform to meritocratic principles, and of the widespread ideas about meritocracy, which placed too much weight on differences that a real meritocrat would regard as minor. The Essay examines several of Justice Marshall's separate opinions - dissents and concurrences - to tease out of them indications of Marshall's meritocratic egalitarianism.

Accepted Paper Series





Not Available For Download

Date posted: February 6, 2009 ; Last revised: March 15, 2009

Suggested Citation

Tushnet, Mark, The Meritocratic Egalitarianism of Thurgood Marshall. Howard Law Journal, Vol. 52, No. 3, 2009; Harvard Public Law Working Paper No. 09-15. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1338073

Contact Information

Mark V. Tushnet (Contact Author)
Harvard Law School ( email )
1575 Massachusetts
Hauser 406
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 528

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.281 seconds