Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1338171
 
 

Footnotes (237)



 


 



Safer than the Mattress? Protecting Social Security Benefits from Bank Freezes and Garnishments


John Infranca


Suffolk University Law School; Furman Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy

November 14, 2008

St. John's Law Review, Vol. 83, Issue 4, 2009

Abstract:     
This Article analyzes the tensions between the anti-assignment provision of the Social Security Act-which exempts benefits from garnishment by creditors seeking payment for outstanding debts-and state-law garnishment procedures. Although federal law explicitly prohibits the garnishment of Social Security and other federal benefits, recipients routinely discover that these funds, which they believed were safely deposited in a bank account, have been temporarily frozen or, even worse, permanently garnished at the behest of a judgment creditor. The problem has been exacerbated in recent years as the collection industry has grown and changes in state laws have made it easier for creditors to garnish bank accounts. At the same time, increasing numbers of benefit recipients are receiving direct electronic deposits, further complicating matters.

Banks, seeking to avoid liability under state law, typically comply with garnishment orders and automatically freeze accounts. This often causes substantial hardship for low-income benefit recipients, who can be left for weeks without access to funds they rely upon for subsistence. A few states have attempted to remedy the problem through legislative and administrative solutions, with mixed success. Congress has also recently held hearings on the issue and federal agencies have proposed a possible response. This Article analyzes these efforts and discusses their limitations before urging a federal legislative response in the form of a five-part policy proposal.

The article expands upon an unpublished working paper written with support from the National Academy of Social Insurance and the Rockefeller Foundation through their Strengthening Social Security for Vulnerable Groups project.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 66

Keywords: Social Security, exempt benefits, debt collection, creditor-debtor issues, banking, direct deposit

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 6, 2009 ; Last revised: June 11, 2012

Suggested Citation

Infranca, John, Safer than the Mattress? Protecting Social Security Benefits from Bank Freezes and Garnishments (November 14, 2008). St. John's Law Review, Vol. 83, Issue 4, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1338171

Contact Information

John Infranca (Contact Author)
Suffolk University Law School ( email )
120 Tremont Street
Boston, MA 02108-4977
United States

Furman Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy ( email )
139 MacDougal St., 2nd Floor
New York, NY 10012
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 869
Downloads: 113
Download Rank: 138,561
Footnotes:  237

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.469 seconds