Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1340185
 


 



Maintaining ADR Integrity


Carrie Menkel-Meadow


Georgetown University Law Center; University of California Irvine, School of Law

August 19, 2010

Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 7-9, January 2009
UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2009-6

Abstract:     
On the occasion of the 30th Anniversary of the Center for Public Resources-International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution, Professor Menkel-Meadow considers the issues in maintaining high quality and integrity in the use of ADR methods, including mediation, negotiation and arbitration. The initial goals of the ADR movement are contrasted to some recent developments and challenges to these goals, with a focus on some key issues to watch in the future -- "sham" processes, misuse of processes for adversarial gain, unethical uses, incompetent parties, lawyers and neutrals and dilution of the original goals of quality and "tailored" dispute resolution.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 6

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 12, 2009 ; Last revised: August 23, 2010

Suggested Citation

Menkel-Meadow, Carrie, Maintaining ADR Integrity (August 19, 2010). Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 7-9, January 2009; UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2009-6. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1340185

Contact Information

Carrie J. Menkel-Meadow (Contact Author)
Georgetown University Law Center ( email )
600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States
202-662-9379 (Phone)
202-662-9412 (Fax)
University of California Irvine, School of Law ( email )
401 E. Peltason Drive
Irvine, CA 92697-1000
United States
949-824-1987 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 665
Downloads: 191
Download Rank: 88,781

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.328 seconds