|
|
|
|
||||
|
||||
Maintaining ADR IntegrityCarrie Menkel-MeadowGeorgetown University Law Center; University of California Irvine, School of Law August 19, 2010 Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 7-9, January 2009 UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2009-6 Abstract: On the occasion of the 30th Anniversary of the Center for Public Resources-International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution, Professor Menkel-Meadow considers the issues in maintaining high quality and integrity in the use of ADR methods, including mediation, negotiation and arbitration. The initial goals of the ADR movement are contrasted to some recent developments and challenges to these goals, with a focus on some key issues to watch in the future -- "sham" processes, misuse of processes for adversarial gain, unethical uses, incompetent parties, lawyers and neutrals and dilution of the original goals of quality and "tailored" dispute resolution.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 6 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: February 12, 2009 ; Last revised: August 23, 2010Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.359 seconds
