|
||||
|
||||
Of Patents and Property
James E. Bessen Research on Innovation; Boston University - School of Law Michael J. Meurer Boston University - School of Law Regulation, Vol. 31, No. 4, Winter 2008-2009 Boston Univ. School of Law Working Paper No. 09-18 Abstract: Do patents behave substantially like property rights in tangible assets, in that they encourage development and innovation? This article notes that historical evidence, cross-country evidence, economic experiments, and estimates of net benefits all indicate that general property rights institutions have a substantial direct effect on economic growth. Conversely, with a few important exceptions like chemicals and pharmaceuticals, empirical evidence indicates that intellectual property rights have at best only a weak and indirect effect on economic growth. Further, it appears that for public firms in most industries today, patents may actually discourage investment in innovation for fear of winding up on the losing side of a patent fight, and routine injunctive relief from patent protection may contribute to this problem.
Keywords: property, intellectual property, property rights, patent, property law, patent law, Industrial Revolution, economic growth, natural economic experiments, Eastern European economies, Eastern European transition, free-riders, generic drug JEL Classifications: D2, D23, D4, K1, K11, L65, 014, 012, 016, 03, 031, 032, 034, P51 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: February 20, 2009 ; Last revised: April 06, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apollo 4 in 0.407 seconds.