|
||||
|
||||
Teaching that Speech Matters: A Framework for Analyzing Speech Issues in SchoolsErwin ChemerinskyUniversity of California, Irvine School of Law UC Davis Law Review, Forthcoming UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2009-2 Abstract: The Supreme Court's recent decision in Morse v. Frederick continues a pattern of judicial unwillingness to protect student speech. A key flaw in the Court's approach is in failing to draw a distinction between government control over the curriculum (and even student speech in curricular activities) and student speech outside the school's curriculum. Deference to school officials is appropriate in the former, but not in the latter. Unfortunately, the Court's approach, as reflected in its last few decisions concerning student speech, has been uncritical deference to schools and far too little protection of student speech.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 18 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: February 11, 2009 ; Last revised: August 21, 2010Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.422 seconds