Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1341212
 


 



Teaching that Speech Matters: A Framework for Analyzing Speech Issues in Schools


Erwin Chemerinsky


University of California, Irvine School of Law


UC Davis Law Review, Forthcoming
UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2009-2

Abstract:     
The Supreme Court's recent decision in Morse v. Frederick continues a pattern of judicial unwillingness to protect student speech. A key flaw in the Court's approach is in failing to draw a distinction between government control over the curriculum (and even student speech in curricular activities) and student speech outside the school's curriculum. Deference to school officials is appropriate in the former, but not in the latter. Unfortunately, the Court's approach, as reflected in its last few decisions concerning student speech, has been uncritical deference to schools and far too little protection of student speech.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 18

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 11, 2009 ; Last revised: August 21, 2010

Suggested Citation

Chemerinsky, Erwin, Teaching that Speech Matters: A Framework for Analyzing Speech Issues in Schools. UC Davis Law Review, Forthcoming; UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2009-2. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1341212

Contact Information

Erwin Chemerinsky (Contact Author)
University of California, Irvine School of Law ( email )
535A Administration
Irvine, CA 92697-1000
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 497
Downloads: 76
Download Rank: 186,405

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.375 seconds