SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

References (55)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Corporate Law and the Rhetoric of Choice

Kent Greenfield
Boston College Law School



LAW AND ECONOMICS: TOWARD SOCIAL JUSTICE, Dana Gold, ed., Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2008
Research in Law and Economics, Vol. 24, 2008
Boston College Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 174

Abstract:     
Rhetorically, the notion of choice has always been a powerful one in politics and law. This essay is intended to offer a note of caution about its use. Despite its progressive hue of individual freedom, the rhetoric of choice increasingly tends to be a notion used to defend and uphold existing matrices of economic and social power. This is because the rhetoric of choice is an excellent way to support exiting power relationships. The assertion that people acting within such power relationships are simply choosing their current situation undermines efforts to change those relationships. The powerful stay powerful; the weak stay weak. This is true in a number of areas, from discussions about school vouchers, to debates about tort reform, to the disagreements surrounding the regulation of pornography.

The dependence on choice rhetoric also exists in corporate law, where the school of thought currently dominant in corporate law doctrine holds that the corporation is best seen as a voluntary arrangement among all the various stakeholders of the corporation. The rhetoric of choice is thus a powerful tool to fight against any reform of current relationships within the corporation that would embolden and empower stakeholders traditionally left out of the corporate power structure. Those involved with the corporation, whether shareholders, employees, or communities, have chosen their position, and thus should not complain when they do not receive more than what they explicitly contracted to receive. In this way, the notion of choice is used to bolster a view of corporate law that protects those already within the corporate power structure and excludes important stakeholders from corporate decision-making. The rhetoric of choice is used in the same way in corporate law discourse as it is used elsewhere by the right-to justify or bolster existing matrices of economic and social power.

Keywords: choice, political theory, political practice, corporations

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: February 12, 2009 ; Last revised: February 15, 2009

Suggested Citation

Greenfield, Kent, Corporate Law and the Rhetoric of Choice (February 11, 2009). LAW AND ECONOMICS: TOWARD SOCIAL JUSTICE, Dana Gold, ed., Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2008; Research in Law and Economics, Vol. 24, 2008; Boston College Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 174. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1341252


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Kent Greenfield (Contact Author)
Boston College Law School ( email )
885 Centre Street
Newton, MA 02459-1163
United States
617-552-3167 (Phone)
617-552-4098 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 206
Downloads: 71
Download Rank: 98,831
References: 55

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.125 seconds.