Abstract

 
 

References (50)



 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



Unbiased Disagreement and the Efficient Market Hypothesis


Clotilde Napp


Université Paris-Dauphine - CNRS-DRM

Elyes Jouini


Universite de Paris 9 Dauphine - CEREMADE

February, 13 2009


Abstract:     
Can behavioral investors be neglected as long as they are rational on average? We show in this paper that there is an important impact of such investors on the behavior of financial markets, even though the pricing formulas are "on average" (over the states of the world) unchanged. In particular we obtain time varying, mean reverting and countercyclical (instead of constant in the standard model) market prices of risk, mean reverting and procyclical (instead of constant) risk free rates, decreasing (instead of flat) yield curves, possibly higher returns and higher risk premia in the long run (instead of a flat structure), more variance, time and state varying (instead of constant) risk sharing rules, as well as more important and procyclical trading volumes. These features seem consistent with the actual behavior of financial markets.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 28

Keywords: Efficient Market Hypthesis, Disagreement, Irrational Investors, Noisy beliefs, Coutercyclical risk premia

JEL Classification: G12, G14, D84, E44

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 16, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Napp, Clotilde and Jouini, Elyes, Unbiased Disagreement and the Efficient Market Hypothesis (February, 13 2009). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1342430 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1342430

Contact Information

Clotilde Napp
Université Paris-Dauphine - CNRS-DRM ( email )
Place de Lattre de Tassigny
Paris, 75775
France
Elyes Jouini (Contact Author)
Universite de Paris 9 Dauphine - CEREMADE ( email )
Place du Marechal de Lattre de Tassigny
Paris Cedex 16, 75775
France
+ 33 1 44 05 46 75 (Phone)
+ 33 1 44 05 45 99 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 571
Downloads: 123
Download Rank: 66,892
References:  50
Citations:  1

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 1.781 seconds