Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1344121
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (121)



 


 



Performing Party Autonomy


Fleur E. Johns


University of New South Wales, Faculty of Law; Faculty of Law, University of NSW

February 16, 2009

Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 71, No. 3, pp. 243-271, 2008
Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 09/06

Abstract:     
Scholarly analysis of choices of law and forum tends to proceed from the moment of a choice having been made, or toward the possibility of its making. As a matter of private international law doctrine, the actual making of a contractual choice of law or forum is virtually unreadable. Corporate choices of law and forum in particular are typically projected as deliberate, measured, and coherent decisions, upon which normative constraints become operative only in anticipation of or after the fact. Yet such accounts sit uneasily with experiences of legal practice. Moreover, such projections of corporate integrity and autonomy are problematic by virtue of the types of inquiry and points of negotiation they foreclose. By way of a rejoinder, this article focuses ethnographically on corporate selections of law and forum in complex trans-boundary transactions. It contends that the factors shaping the enactment of choice in a complex deal are normatively irreducible to the apparently determined choices attributed to the entities in question and the principles of private international law that purport to uphold or constrain those choices. It argues, nonetheless, that corporate parties' enactments of autonomous preference tend to be structured in particular, patterned ways and it works to illuminate some of those patterns. In so doing, it recalls the contributions of legal realists to private international law, especially the work of Walter Wheeler Cook.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 28

Keywords: international law, conflict of laws, private international law, legal realism, sociology of law, transnational corporations, corporate transactions, party autonomy, choice of law, choice of forum

JEL Classification: K10, K11, K30, K33

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: February 16, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Johns, Fleur E., Performing Party Autonomy (February 16, 2009). Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 71, No. 3, pp. 243-271, 2008; Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 09/06. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1344121

Contact Information

Fleur E. Johns (Contact Author)
University of New South Wales, Faculty of Law ( email )
Kensington, New South Wales 2052
Australia
Faculty of Law, University of NSW ( email )
Faculty of Law
University of NSW
Sydney, NSW 2052
Australia
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 759
Downloads: 144
Download Rank: 123,123
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  121
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.265 seconds