Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1344502
 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



The Reconceptualization of Legislative History in the Supreme Court


Charles Tiefer


University of Baltimore - School of Law

2000

Wisconsin Law Review, p. 205, 2000

Abstract:     
In 1995, the Supreme Court began to embrace a approach to interpreting Congressional intent. From that year forward, the Breyers-Stevens model of legislative history, or "institutional legislative history," has seen significant success, emerging in the shadows of the success Justice Scalia's enjoyed while promoting his brand of textualism in the early 1990s. In developing a new way to view Congressional intent, Justices Breyers and Stevens synthesize information gathered from congressional report details, preferably attached to bill drafting choices, thereby renouncing Scalia's reliance on the purposes espoused by the Congressional majority. This new approach, the author contends, rejuvenated the court's approach to legislative history, offering a superior and more holistic approach toward uncovering Congressional intent.

This article, in seeking to illustrate why "institutional legislative history" has enjoyed significant success in the Court, traces the developments in the early 1990s that led to the Court's shift from textualism to Justices Breyers and Stevens's conceptualization. By examining seventeen recent opinions, the author uncovers the philosophical and political theories compelling the Court's decisions before asking important questions about their continued viability.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 74

Keywords: Supreme Court, Scalia, Breyes, Stevens, textualism, legislative history, statutes, 'Busy Congress', Chevron, Austin/Hart, Searle, Conference Reports, Congressional intent, Congressional reports, statutory interpretation

JEL Classification: K39, K49

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 18, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Tiefer, Charles, The Reconceptualization of Legislative History in the Supreme Court (2000). Wisconsin Law Review, p. 205, 2000. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1344502

Contact Information

Charles Tiefer (Contact Author)
University of Baltimore - School of Law ( email )
1420 N. Charles Street
Baltimore, MD 21201
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 298
Downloads: 31
Citations:  1

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.297 seconds