Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1344552
 
 

Footnotes (67)



 


 



Saving Face: The Benefits of Not Saying I'm Sorry


Brent T. White


University of Arizona - James E. Rogers College of Law

February, 16 2009

Law and Contemporary Problems, 2009
Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 09-07

Abstract:     
This forthcoming article explores the question of why individuals resist apologizing, even when it is rationally in their best interest to do so - such as when it would significantly reduce a criminal sentence or settle a civil lawsuit at little or no cost. Drawing on a significant body of research by social psychologists on apology, the article posits that individuals primarily resist apology when it poses an intolerable threat to their face - or their claimed identity as competent, intelligent, or moral persons. In light of this research, the article then critiques the failure of recent laws designed to encourage or compel apology to take face into account.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 14

Keywords: apology, law and psychology, sociology, torts, criminal law

JEL Classification: K42, K4, K14, K13

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: February 19, 2009  

Suggested Citation

White, Brent T., Saving Face: The Benefits of Not Saying I'm Sorry (February, 16 2009). Law and Contemporary Problems, 2009; Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 09-07. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1344552

Contact Information

Brent T. White (Contact Author)
University of Arizona - James E. Rogers College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 210176
Tucson, AZ 85721-0176
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,949
Downloads: 373
Download Rank: 45,281
Footnotes:  67

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.296 seconds