Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1345389
 
 

Footnotes (20)



 


 



The Mighty Myths of Kelo


John R. Nolon


Pace University School of Law

2007

Government, Law and Policy Journal, Vol. 9, p. 10, 2007

Abstract:     
The press releases of property rights activists and the media's rapid embrace of their views have perpetuated several myths about the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Kelo v. New London. In the immediate aftermath of this myth making, the legislatures of several states have adopted restrictions on the use of eminent domain with uncharacteristic speed. Wisely, the New York State Legislature has been more cautious in its reaction. As it turns out, many of the eminent domain laws in other states have nothing to do with New London's program of area-wide redevelopment or the legal holding of the Kelo case. In fact some will have the unintended consequence of crippling state and municipal efforts to direct the redevelopment of inner-city neighborhoods, coastal areas subject to inundation due to climate change, and cities trying to rebuild after devastating natural disasters.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 5

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: February 24, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Nolon, John R., The Mighty Myths of Kelo (2007). Government, Law and Policy Journal, Vol. 9, p. 10, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1345389

Contact Information

John R. Nolon (Contact Author)
Pace University School of Law ( email )
78 North Broadway
White Plains, NY 10603
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 436
Downloads: 48
Footnotes:  20

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.343 seconds