|
||||
|
||||
Non-Comparative Versus Comparative Advertising as a Quality SignalWinand EmonsUniversity of Bern - Department of Economics; Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) Claude FluetUniversity of Quebec at Montreal (UQAM) - Department of Economics January 2009 CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP7109 Abstract: Two firms produce a product with a horizontal and a vertical characteristic. We call the vertical characteristic quality. The difference in the quality levels determines how the firms share the market. Firms know the quality levels, consumers do not. Under non-comparative advertising a firm may signal its own quality. Under comparative advertising firms may signal the quality differential. In both scenarios the firms may attempt to mislead at a cost. If firms advertise, in both scenarios equilibria are revealing. Under comparative advertising the firms never advertise together which they may do under non-comparative advertising.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 30 Keywords: advertising, costly state falsification, signalling JEL Classification: D82, K41, K42 working papers seriesDate posted: February 18, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.766 seconds