Abstract

 


 



Book Review: The Origins of Reasonable Doubt - Theological Roots of the Criminal Trial by James Q. Whitman


H. L. Ho


National University of Singapore (NUS) - Faculty of Law

December 31, 2008

Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, p. 455 - 466, 2008

Abstract:     
In Woolmington v. DPP [1935] A.C. 426 (at 481), Lord Sankey famously referred to the doctrine that requires the prosecution to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt as "the golden thread" that "runs throughout the web of English Criminal Law". This doctrine is by no means peculiar to England; "proof beyond reasonable doubt" is the standard of proof universally adopted in the common law world, hailed by the Privy Council as "fundamental to the administration of justice" in Yuvajay v. PP [1970] A.C. 913 (at 921) and by V.K. Rajah J.A. as a "bedrock principle [which is] sacrosanct in our criminal justice system" in Sakthivel Punithavathi v. PP [2007] SGHC 54, [2007] 2 S.L.R. 983 (at para. 78).

Number of Pages in PDF File: 3

Accepted Paper Series


Date posted: February 19, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Ho, H. L., Book Review: The Origins of Reasonable Doubt - Theological Roots of the Criminal Trial by James Q. Whitman (December 31, 2008). Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, p. 455 - 466, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1346262

Contact Information

H. L. Ho (Contact Author)
National University of Singapore (NUS) - Faculty of Law ( email )
469G Bukit Timah Road
Eu Tong Sen Building
Singapore, 259776
Singapore
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 286
Downloads: 6

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.406 seconds