Social Comparisons and Deception Across Workplace Hierarchies: Field and Experimental Evidence
Benjamin G. Edelman
Harvard University - HBS Negotiations, Organizations and Markets Unit
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - Anderson School of Management
August 22, 2014
Organization Science (Forthcoming)
We examine how unfavorable social comparisons differentially spur employees of varying hierarchical levels to engage in deception. Drawing on literatures in social psychology and workplace self-esteem, we theorize that negative comparisons with peers could cause either junior or senior employees to seek to improve reported relative performance measures via deception. In a first study, we use deceptive self-downloads on SSRN, the leading working paper repository in the social sciences, to show that employees higher in a hierarchy are more likely to engage in deception, particularly when the employee has enjoyed a high level of past success. In a second study, we confirm this finding in two scenario-based experiments. Our results suggest that longer-tenured and more successful employees face a greater loss of self-esteem from negative social comparisons, and are more likely engage in deception in response to reported performance that is lower than that of peers.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 49
Date posted: February 19, 2009 ; Last revised: August 22, 2014
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.329 seconds