Footnotes (224)



Looking for Fair Use in the DMCA's Safety Dance

Ira Steven Nathenson

St. Thomas University School of Law

September 7, 2009

Akron Intellectual Property Journal, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 121-170, 2009

Like a ballet, the notice-and-take-down provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA") provide complex procedures to obtain take-downs of online infringement. Copyright owners send notices of infringement to service providers, who in turn remove claimed infringement in exchange for a statutory safe harbor from copyright liability. But like a dance meant for two, the DMCA is less effective in protecting the "third wheel," the users of internet services. This Article puts forth a "fair-use friendly" way of reading the DMCA to better protect users of online services. This Article examines the structure of the Copyright Act and broader principles of procedural fairness, concluding that permitting copyright owners to obtain removal of fairly used materials would accomplish de facto ex parte seizures of speech.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 50

Keywords: Cyberlaw, intellectual property, fair use, copyright, legislation, statutory interpretation, civil procedure, DMCA, Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 512, intermediary liability, take-down, takedown, counter-notice, counter-notification, counternotice, Lenz, McCain, Ashcroft

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: September 8, 2009 ; Last revised: May 13, 2014

Suggested Citation

Nathenson, Ira Steven, Looking for Fair Use in the DMCA's Safety Dance (September 7, 2009). Akron Intellectual Property Journal, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 121-170, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1347429

Contact Information

Ira Steven Nathenson (Contact Author)
St. Thomas University School of Law ( email )
16401 N.W. 37th Ave.
Miami, FL 33054
United States
(305) 474-2454 (Phone)
(305) 623-2390 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://nathenson.org

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,380
Downloads: 166
Download Rank: 134,094
Footnotes:  224
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.187 seconds