Explaining the American Norm against Litigation
Shawn J. Bayern
Florida State University - College of Law
California Law Review, Vol. 93, p. 1697, 2005
FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 350
FSU College of Law, Law, Business & Economics Paper No. 09-09
In the United States, a social norm discourages people from vindicating at least some of their rights in court. However, if courts are an instrument of justice and of sound public policy -- for instance, if they provide fair compensation for injured parties and efficient incentives for potential injurers -- then a norm against using courts is puzzling.
This Comment explores and evaluates explanations for the norm against litigation; the Comment's goal is to provide a plausible account of the norm. Accordingly, the Comment is largely descriptive, but normative implications may follow from my exploration; for instance, to the extent that an explanation of the norm is plausible, the explanation may help to frame the debate about tort reform in the United States.
The Comment serves also as a test of prominent "law and social norms" theories; for example, reductions of social norms to signal-based theories are shown to fail to account for the norm against litigation.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 23
Keywords: law and social norms, litigation, justice, efficiency, mercy, courts
JEL Classification: K10, K41Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: February 26, 2009 ; Last revised: June 22, 2009
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.797 seconds