Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1348724
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (36)



 


 



Rita v. United States Leaves More Open than it Answers


Stephanos Bibas


University of Pennsylvania Law School


Federal Sentencing Reporter, Vol. 20, No. 28, October 2007
U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 09-04

Abstract:     
This essay surveys the sentencing issues left open by Rita v. United States and considers how the presumption of reasonableness is likely to operate in practice and how rebuttable it is, the roles of safe harbors and individual judges' policy disagreements, and the importance of Justices Stevens and Ginsburg as the swing Justices in this area. This line of cases has drifted far from its roots in a Sixth Amendment concern for juries. Though the resulting sentencing policies may be substantively desirable, the Court cannot articulate how they are rooted in the Sixth Amendment's concern for juries.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 6

Keywords: Criminal sentences, Federal Sentencing Guidelines, maximum sentences, juries, Sentencing Reform Act, Apprendi, Blakely, Booker, Sixth Amendment

JEL Classification: K14, K42

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 25, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Bibas, Stephanos, Rita v. United States Leaves More Open than it Answers. Federal Sentencing Reporter, Vol. 20, No. 28, October 2007; U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 09-04. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1348724

Contact Information

Stephanos Bibas (Contact Author)
University of Pennsylvania Law School ( email )
3501 Sansom Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
215-746-2297 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.upenn.edu/cf/faculty/sbibas/
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 553
Downloads: 32
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  36

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.344 seconds