Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1348902
 
 

References (73)



 


 



Feminist Theory, Global Gender Justice, and the Evaluation of Grant-Making


Brooke A. Ackerly


Vanderbilt University

February 24, 2009


Abstract:     
In activist circles feminist political thought is often viewed as abstract because it does not help activists make the kinds of arguments that are generally effective with donors and policy makers. The feminist political philosopher's focus on how we know and what counts as knowledge is a large step away from the terrain in which activists make their arguments to donors. Yet, philosophical reflection on the relations between power and knowledge can make a significant contribution to women's human rights work in the area of evaluation. Feminist political philosophy can offer guidelines for how to evaluate the work of women's human rights organizations and their funders in light of the social, political, and economic conditions that render their work necessary and difficult. This article offers 1) an account of the difficulty in showing the impact of social change activism using conventional modes of measurement, particularly those that focus on first order effects, 2) feminist theoretical insights into the interrelatedness of global gender injustices that may help us develop better benchmarks of evaluation for women's human rights programming, and 3) a sketch of how to approach the evaluation of organizations and donors who seek to support global gender justice.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 25

Keywords: feminism, global justice, women's rights, philanthropy, development

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 26, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Ackerly, Brooke A., Feminist Theory, Global Gender Justice, and the Evaluation of Grant-Making (February 24, 2009). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1348902 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1348902

Contact Information

Brooke A. Ackerly (Contact Author)
Vanderbilt University ( email )
Nashville, TN 37240
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,100
Downloads: 202
Download Rank: 83,408
References:  73

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.328 seconds