The Significance of Private Burdens and Lost Benefits for a Fair-Play Analysis of Punishment
Shawn J. Bayern
Florida State University - College of Law
February 1, 2009
New Criminal Law Review, Vol. 12, p. 1, 2009
FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 348
Herbert Morris's "fair-play" account of retributivism explains punishment as an attempt to restore a fair balance between burdens and benefits. Benefits accrue unfairly to offenders from their crimes, and punishment imposes corresponding burdens. Because of the necessary interval between crime and punishment, however, events following an offender's crime may restore a fair balance between burdens and benefits before the state can effect punishment. This article explores the implications of such events on the justice of punishment under a fairness-based theory.
More specifically, this article considers several classes of situations in which an offender's position has changed since the occurrence of a crime such that punishment may be unjust. These situations fall into two broad categories: (1) those in which the offender has suffered a burden as a result of the crime from a source other than punishment by the state, and (2) those in which an offender does not retain any "benefit" from her crime at the time punishment would be imposed. Punishment in either of these situations may be unjust under an account that depends on a comparison between benefits from crime and burdens from punishment.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 42
Keywords: fair play, criminal theory, punishment, benefits, burdens, time
JEL Classification: K14Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: February 25, 2009 ; Last revised: June 9, 2009
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.406 seconds