|
||||
|
||||
Are Judges Overpaid? A Skeptical Response to the Judicial Salary DebateStephen J. ChoiNew York University School of Law G. Mitu GulatiDuke University - School of Law Eric A. PosnerUniversity of Chicago - Law School January 21, 2009 The Journal of Legal Analysis, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 47-117, 2009 U of Chicago Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper No. 460 Abstract: The public debate over the need to raise judicial salaries has been one-sided. Sentiment appears to be that judges are underpaid. But neither theory nor evidence provides much support for this view. The primary argument being made in favor of a pay increase is that it will raise the quality of judging. Theory suggests that increasing judicial salaries will improve judicial performance only if judges can be sanctioned for performing inadequately or if the appointments process reliably screens out low-ability candidates. However, federal judges and many state judges cannot be sanctioned, and the reliability of screening processes is open to question. An empirical study of the high court judges of the fifty states provides little evidence that raising salaries would improve judicial performance.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 72 Keywords: judges, judicial salaries JEL Classification: K10, K40 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: April 2, 2009 ; Last revised: April 15, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.703 seconds