Legal Positivism? What Are You Talking About? ('De Quel Positivisme Parlez-Vous?')
University of Montreal - Faculty of Law
University of Quebec at Montreal; Yale University - Law School
May 20, 2008
MELANGES ANDREE LAJOIE, L. Rolland and P. Noreau, eds., pp. 33-60, Montréal: Thémis, 2008
Of all the concepts in use in the legal discourse, "legal positivism" is certainly one of the most polysemous. This is why one currently runs the risk of being misunderstood when making use of it. In particular, there is a sharp distinction between how legal theorists use the concept and how it is most often used by other legal scholars and legal practicioners. This paper attempts to succinctly present a typology of the different uses of the concept in order to facilitate more fruitful discussions. We have classified the different uses of the concept in three broad categories: (1) legal positivism as a methodological approach to the study of law; (2) legal positivism as a theory of law; and (3) legal positivism as an ideology. Each category is further subdivided so as to highlight different currents in the use of the concept within each category.
Note: Downloadable document is in French.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 29
Keywords: Legal theory, legal positivism, legal formalism, legal stasis, monism, Hans Kelsen, H.L.A. Hart, legalism
JEL Classification: K10Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: February 26, 2009 ; Last revised: March 30, 2009
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.453 seconds