Letting Federal Unions Protest Improper Contracting-Out
University of Baltimore - School of Law
affiliation not provided to SSRN
Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, Vol. 10, p. 581, 2001
In 2000 - 2001, a judicial and General Accounting Office (GAO) ruling precluded federal employee unions from protesting the government's alleged violation of the rules governing the contracting-out procedure because the parties lacked standing. These rulings illustrate how outdated procedures have insulated the government from challenge, and have become matters of particular importance as the government increases its practice of contracting-out. Although these rulings have not closed the tribunal doors to federal employee unions, they have made protests much more difficult, leaving federal employee unions without a forum to protest violations. To better serve the needs of contractors - and the public - the authors suggest fresh executive, judicial, and congressional looks at the matter, as contracting-out protests are uniquely situated to be dealt with by any of the three branches of government.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 20
Keywords: Protests, Federal Union Employees, Contracting-out, GAO, Zone of Interest, FAIR Act, standing, AFGE v. U.S., In re RCA Service Company, National Federation of Federal Employees v. Cheney, procedure
JEL Classification: K39, K49Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: February 26, 2009
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.422 seconds