Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1350045
 
 

Citations (2)



 


 



Dilution of a Trademark: European and United States Law Compared


J. Thomas McCarthy


University of San Francisco School of Law

November-December 2004

Trademark Reporter, Vol. 94, p. 1163, November-December 2004

Abstract:     
The author compares the trademark anti-dilution and anti-free riding provisions of Articles 4(4)(a) and 5(2) of the 1988 European Union Trademark Directive with the United States Federal Trademark Dilution Act of 1996. Interpretations of the European Court of Justice are compared with that of the United States Supreme Court in the Victoria's Secret decision and of the lower federal courts. The author concludes that on both sides of the Atlantic, the courts have resolved cases by an abstract reading of the wording of their respective laws, divorced from their theoretical foundations. In both the E.U. and the U.S., courts have had little success in making sense of their anti-dilution laws.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 19

Keywords: trademark, anti-dilution, anti-free riding, EU, European Union, Trademark Directive, Trademark Dilution Act, Victoria's secret

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 28, 2009  

Suggested Citation

McCarthy, J. Thomas, Dilution of a Trademark: European and United States Law Compared (November-December 2004). Trademark Reporter, Vol. 94, p. 1163, November-December 2004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1350045

Contact Information

J. Thomas McCarthy (Contact Author)
University of San Francisco School of Law
2130 Fulton Street
San Francisco, CA 94117
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,637
Downloads: 429
Download Rank: 36,967
Citations:  2

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.250 seconds