Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1350520
 
 

References (41)



 


 



Business Models and Compatibility Incentives


Feng Zhu


Harvard University - Harvard Business School

March 22, 2010


Abstract:     
This paper examines the compatibility incentives of two competing networks in a setting where the networks can choose fee-based or ad-sponsored business models and the sources of differentiation come from both network products and their users. In contrast to the prior literature, we find that the networks have no incentives to be compatible when they are both fee-based. The networks prefer compatibility when they are both ad-sponsored and the prevailing ad rate is high. Interestingly, after endogenizing the choices of business models, we find that the networks choose ad-sponsored business models in equilibrium even when they do not profit from ads. In addition, compatibility does not always improve user welfare. We also find that asymmetric choices of business models appear in equilibrium when one network has a significant installed-base advantage and the prevailing ad rate is low. In this case, the bigger network adopts a fee-based model, whereas the other adopts an ad-sponsored model, and the two networks stay incompatible.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 29

Keywords: Ad-sponsored, Compatibility, Two-sided networks, Social networks, Business models

JEL Classification: L15, L10, M21

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 28, 2009 ; Last revised: March 30, 2010

Suggested Citation

Zhu, Feng, Business Models and Compatibility Incentives (March 22, 2010). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1350520 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1350520

Contact Information

Feng Zhu (Contact Author)
Harvard University - Harvard Business School ( email )
Soldiers Field Road
Morgan 431
Boston, MA 02163
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/profile.aspx?facId=14938
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 813
Downloads: 154
Download Rank: 110,778
References:  41
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.297 seconds