Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1350975
 
 

Footnotes (59)



 


 



Rethinking Press Rights of Equal Access


Luke M. Milligan


University of Louisville - Louis D. Brandeis School of Law

February 28, 2009

Washington and Lee Law Review, Vol. 65, No. 1103, 2008
University of Louisville School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series No. 2009-07

Abstract:     
The prevailing approach to First Amendment equal-access litigation, turning on the "general inclusivity" of government access, is deeply flawed. The standard has proved to be, in the end, exceedingly permissive, hopelessly vague, and, perhaps most importantly, theoretically incompatible with the Supreme Court's emerging view that access is a form of government subsidy. This essay calls on the courts to abandon their reliance on inclusiveness, and, in its place, tailor the definition of "access" to include only those government acts conducted "pursuant to official duties." The resulting doctrine would be one worthy of the federal courts -- durable, coherent, and duly respectful of the traditional relations between public officials and the press.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 15

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 10, 2009 ; Last revised: October 13, 2009

Suggested Citation

Milligan, Luke M., Rethinking Press Rights of Equal Access (February 28, 2009). Washington and Lee Law Review, Vol. 65, No. 1103, 2008; University of Louisville School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series No. 2009-07. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1350975

Contact Information

Luke M. Milligan (Contact Author)
University of Louisville - Louis D. Brandeis School of Law ( email )
Wilson W. Wyatt Hall
Louisville, KY 40292
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 467
Downloads: 96
Download Rank: 161,092
Footnotes:  59

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.328 seconds