Rethinking Press Rights of Equal Access
Luke M. Milligan
University of Louisville - Louis D. Brandeis School of Law
February 28, 2009
Washington and Lee Law Review, Vol. 65, No. 1103, 2008
University of Louisville School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series No. 2009-07
The prevailing approach to First Amendment equal-access litigation, turning on the "general inclusivity" of government access, is deeply flawed. The standard has proved to be, in the end, exceedingly permissive, hopelessly vague, and, perhaps most importantly, theoretically incompatible with the Supreme Court's emerging view that access is a form of government subsidy. This essay calls on the courts to abandon their reliance on inclusiveness, and, in its place, tailor the definition of "access" to include only those government acts conducted "pursuant to official duties." The resulting doctrine would be one worthy of the federal courts -- durable, coherent, and duly respectful of the traditional relations between public officials and the press.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 15Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: March 10, 2009 ; Last revised: October 13, 2009
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.953 seconds