Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1351005
 
 

Footnotes (179)



 


 



Towards Non-Neutral Principles of Private Law: Designing Secondary Liability Rules for New Technological Uses


Thomas Folsom


Regent University School of Law

November 1, 2008

Akron Intellectual Property Journal, Vol. 3, p. 41, 2009

Abstract:     
A series of recent cases revisits secondary liability in intellectual property law, solving some particular problems but without providing completely specified rules that are predictable and principled. Prior law already includes several varieties of secondary liability with a rationale for each. Together, these old and new sources point the way towards a synthesis which may allow for a designed solution that is more fully specified, at least in respect of new technological uses. When all is said, secondary liability in intellectual property law still turns on two essential questions: (1) is there someone who is liable for direct infringement, and if so (2) is it "just" to hold someone else accountable? Both of these inquiries contain embedded variables which are to a surprising degree free and indeterminate with respect to users of new technologies in "places" created by code. These places created by code include the metaverse, virtual worlds, cypherspace, and cyberspace proper (the "code world"). The code world and the new machines that enable it constitute new technological uses (NTUs) that have great economic and practical consequence. I propose legal rules purposely chosen to encourage a designed architecture for NTUs that will prefer hitchhikers, guides and ordinary users over predators, pirates and spoilers of the new machines and the code world. I propose both a short term solution centered on interim safe harbors and a longer term project to disintegrate liability-style rules from property-style rules. The solutions depend upon intentional design of liability rules (is there someone liable for direct infringement?), and of limited remedies intentionally fitted to the new technological uses for which they are designed (is it "just" to hold someone else accountable?)

Number of Pages in PDF File: 62

Keywords: Secondary liability, Non-neutral rules, Intellectual property, new technological uses, hostage style, consent style, safe harbors, distintegrating intellectual proprerty

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 1, 2009 ; Last revised: September 21, 2009

Suggested Citation

Folsom, Thomas, Towards Non-Neutral Principles of Private Law: Designing Secondary Liability Rules for New Technological Uses (November 1, 2008). Akron Intellectual Property Journal, Vol. 3, p. 41, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1351005

Contact Information

Thomas C. Folsom (Contact Author)
Regent University School of Law ( email )
Virginia Beach, VA 23464
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 367
Downloads: 58
Download Rank: 217,599
Footnotes:  179
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.375 seconds