The Original Law Journals
Ross E. Davies
George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School, Faculty; The Green Bag
March 2, 2009
Green Bag 2d, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 187-217, Winter 2009
George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 09-15
Commercially speaking, law journalism was a risky business in the early Republic. According to Frederick Hicks, of the 30 legal periodicals that went into business before 1850, 24 also went out of business before 1850. And of the six that survived into the second half of the century, five expired by 1866, leaving just one to carry on over the long term. (That one is the Legal Intelligencer of Philadelphia, which is still in operation today.) A simple recitation of Hicks's body count does not, however, reveal the full intensity of the semi-Hobbesian existence of those early journals. A few features of their experience merit a bit more attention. First, the very short lifespans. Second, the total number of failures. Third, the persistence of failure despite enthusiastic support from pillars of the bar. And fourth, the depths of obscurity into which those failed journals have tended to fall.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 34
Keywords: American Law Journal, Jurist and Law Miscellany, law reviews, magazines, Militia Reporter, New Yale Judicial Repository, publishing, reporters
JEL Classification: A20, C15, C80, C93, D71, D72, K00
Date posted: March 4, 2009
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.203 seconds